- #EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD FULL#
- #EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD PRO#
- #EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD PC#
(192.168.1.0/24 on the LAN ans DHCP on WAN)Ĭonfigure a starting firewall configuration.īlock Everything IN on the WAN interface.Īccept Established and related connections IN on the WAN interfaceīlock everything to the router on the WAN interface Now we are on Firmware 1.4.0 and here is what has been added.īind your WAN an LAN interfaces. They are very active with the community and takes suggestions very seriously. Now there is the Edgerouter PoE, Edgerouter and Edgerouter PRO.Īt the time, on firmware 1.0.2, the device looked scary for begginners since you had to manually configure everything in the router.īut since then, there had many updates on the firmware, and a LOT of improvements. I'm an engineer, not a marketing guyĪ yeay ago Tim Higgins did a review of the Ubiquiti Edgemax Edge router lite.Īt the the time, there was only the edgerouter Lite, wich is the small version of it.
I believe UniFi can do the other things you asked, but we should probably find someone more UniFi knowledgeable than me. The UniFi APs are power via PoE, so depending on how many APs you have the 5 port EdgeRouter-PoE might be able to suit your needs and power the APs. Then I can add firewall rules such the the guest network only has access to Internet, the testing network has access to Internet and some shared resources such as printers and NAS, and the production network has no restrictions. This is convenient because on the router I can configure those VLAN each to have a different subnet and their own dhcp-server. We have 3 SSIDs (production, testing, guest) and UniFi tags them each with a different VLAN.
#EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD PRO#
What I can tell you is that we use a EdgeRouter Pro as our corporate router/firewall and (no surprise) UniFi for our wireless. Obviously Ubiquiti does have the UniFi wifi product line, but to tell you the truth I don't know much about UniFi. I just forwarded a CNAME from a subdomain of one the domains I own to the dynDNS name and don't have to have some gibberish to get to my home services.Click to expand.L&LD, most of your question seem wifi related and the EdgeMAX line of router don't have built-in wifi. One nice feature is they have a built in module for dynDNS and after setting it up they give you a hostname.
#EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD FULL#
I have used it before on some old computers just to mess around with and it will run on almost any old computer with a couple NIC's but the older it is the less likely you will get full throughput. I believe ddwrt also has an x86 version that would run as well but I can not remember if they require it to be a paid for or not due to it not being a off the shelf NAT/Gateway. It's a bit oversimplified but would be good for someone who has zero experience or hardware would not support something else. I started to repurpose my old fileserver to OpenSense or PFsense but there is some weird issue and it will not work correctly (old p4 2.8 in an intel board and 1GB ddr ram). Make an external connection attempt to "12345". Configure ethereal to monitor for traffic on "12345".
#EDGEROUTER LITE PORT FORWARDING WIZARD PC#
Configure a port forward to hit your PC for port "12345". However, since you don't have that, basically you're stuck running ethereal on your PC (or tcpdump on the NAS is also fine). We'd first tell you to run "tcpdump -i eth0 port 12345" on the Internet-facing side combined with an external connection attempt to port 12345 to verify that the traffic's getting to you. With something like the EdgeRouter Lite, you actually get a known-competent device. We have to tell you to get a tool like "ethereal" on a PC on your LAN, then to configure port forwarding on the modem, then to use a tool out on the Internet to initiate a connection inward, and to watch for the traffic, and then try to read tea leaves as to what's going on. This isn't necessarily required to resolve the issue at hand here, but one of the downsides of a combined cable modem and NAT gateway is that you can't easily see what's happening on the Internet-facing side of the modem. So then you just configure the SurfBoard Gateway for "bridge" mode and connect your NAT gateway to it. "tcpdump" is wonderful for debugging connectivity problems like this. By using one of these as your NAT gateway, it means you can actually log in to the device and inspect the traffic on both sides of the NAT process, unlike the cable modem.
My suggestion for anyone brave enough to FreeNAS would be either a pfSense box (yay FreeBSD), or, an easier option, the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite (not-so-yay Linux). Yeah, might be worth checking to see if there's fundamental brokenness going on here with the port forwarding.īut I'd also encourage you to consider getting a real NAT gateway (what you guys call a "router") and not using the crud NAT built into the SurfBoard Gateway.
0 kommentar(er)
